Under Our Noses
LGBTQ+ activists have joined forces with the federal and state government to indoctrinate our children
I posted three items on Twitter yesterday. See if you notice the common thread.
First was this video from gubernatorial candidate Ammon Bundy:
Second was this video from Anna K. Miller of the IFF’s Center for American Education:
Finally, my friend Raheem Kassam and his colleague Natalie Winters posted this overview of a series of studies on the family at the National Pulse:
What do these stories have in common? They all involve attacks on the nuclear family.
Nothing that Mr. Bundy said in his ad is incorrect. LGBTQ+ activists have an agenda that involves normalizing their lifestyles and fetishes in the minds of young people. Why is Bundy the only major candidate talking about this? Why is Governor Little ceding this issue to someone that is considered to be on the fringe? Perhaps he believes that he has enough institutional backing to win this election handily without wading into anything remotely controversial, but what about his duty to protect the citizens of Idaho? There is no citizen more vulnerable than a child, and this agenda is explicitly targeting them.
What about Anna Miller’s expose of our public school system and state health department laundering LGBTQ+ propaganda using taxpayer dollars? I remember standing ten feet away from the Republican candidate for State Superintendent of Public Instruction when she said that these allegations were made up by her opponent for political purposes. Why are Republican leaders covering their eyes and pretending this is not happening? Do they really think that if they ignore it, everything will turn out fine?
I believe that the National Pulse piece about the studies shows that the family is the linchpin of all of these issues. Dismantling the nuclear family has long been a Marxist goal, because the nuclear family is the foundation of society. The family is the building block upon which communities and nations are made. Cultural Marxism, aka Critical Theory, takes it as a given that our society is irredeemably broken - racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, etc - and so they are deliberately attempting to dismantle that society so they can build a new one, based on diversity, inclusion, and equity.
Destroying the family is part of this effort to remake society. Critical theorists cast the nuclear family as part of a white supremacist cisheteronormative structure and therefore not worthy of respect. When conservatives say “Children deserve a father and a mother,” a statement that was uncontroversial for all of human history until a few years ago, leftists call us racist, sexist, and homophobic.
Last week, the Guardian reported on a lawsuit by a homosexual couple against the City of New York that claims their employee insurance program discriminates against gay couples because it does not pay for in-vitro fertilization and surrogacy. “We are expected to be OK with not having children,” the couple told the newspaper. In the modern zeitgeist, definitions of male and female have been twisted beyond all recognition and we are literally told that 2 + 2 = 5. Once you accept these absurdities, why not go ahead and say that homosexual men have the natural right to rent a woman’s womb to create a child so they can complete their perverted facsimile of a family, all at taxpayer expense?
There is a massive gulf between the intentions for our brave new world and the reality before our eyes. Rather than a paradise of love and inclusion, it is an absolute hellscape. Gay couples are using women to create a child who will have two fathers but no mother. Doctors are mutilating teenagers, children even, slicing up their genitals to transform them into grotesque simulacra of the opposite sex. Language is being redefined before our very eyes, as words now mean the opposite of what they once did.
And all of this is happening with the enthusiastic consent of the Idaho state government.
As Anna Miller said, we need to follow the money. In Tennessee, undercover video exposed how doctors at Vanderbilt University Medical Center understand how much money children’s sex change surgeries brings in. Rather than examining themselves, university staff instead wiped their webpage of references to the barbaric practice and attacked critics as hateful.
St. Luke’s in Boise offers similar services. Will the Idaho GOP come out as strongly as their Tennessee counterparts recently did?
Ammon Bundy is portrayed by corporate media and Republican leadership alike as the extremist, the scofflaw, the iconoclast, but why is he talking about these things while Governor Little brags about spending more taxpayer dollars on education while kowtowing with rich megadonors? Republicans - city council members, county commissioners, legislators, and the governor himself - need to stand as one and not only demand this end, but do everything in their power to stop it. The next generation literally depends on it.
I am an oft critic of Mr. Bundy, not because he is an "extremist," he is not. He is indeed a scofflaw and should be considered by Conservatives as largely irrelevant. Except of course when he breaks the law - we are the law and order group after all.
That Ammon Bundy on occasion speaks the truth does not make him governor "material." I can quote the Bible but it does not make me Jesus.
I agree with your column Brian and our job - yours and mine is to make certain our LD delegation is loaded for this when the session begins in January. Regardless of who is governor we must extricate our state government - money and agencies from these efforts.
Bundy’s ad is excellent and further demonstrates his dedication to being on the right side of history. Republicans are so caught up with mourning the Conservative party and asleep at the wheel. Many educated and informed voters will not be giving the republicans a pass in November just because there’s an R by the candidate’s name. Meanwhile, Dorothy moon is going around campaigning for more donations for the broken Republican Party. I really like Ms Moon, but I hope she can acknowledge that a good, conservative candidate can be possible even without the R.